There was an anonymous gentleman that used to banter back and forth on telegram. Several different alias names. I believe he most likely is known as jjPP on Investors Hub.

We would have good discussions regarding the mystery and allurement of iEthereum.

“Was it a currency or was it a token?”

Thoughts on supply, distribution, logo, team, development, etc. Anything regarding iEthereum that we could share; we would.

At that time, we were of both of the consensus that if it were to be a secret high value project that we would see interference being played to continue to have the project look weak, fraudulent and underfunded. And more importantly, get people that invested early to relinquish their iEthereum holdings.

We have seen this from day one. These instances are documented and have escalated through the years. This is one good reason why we started the iEthereum Advocacy Trust. If we can provide good information on a weekly basis, perhaps new holders and original holders of iEthereum can be comforted as opposed to being left in the dark and self doubting.

We have highlighted the fact that the original iEthereum whitepaper, day #1, was most likely written with a typo generator software. Why would a project do this? Let me first ask you; Why would a project not use spell and/or grammar checker before publishing the paper? Its possible, but in this day and age, it is more likely that the project wanted to look less interesting than it actually is. This is the first example of the project running interference to avoid premature ejaculation. Get your mind out of the gutter. The original whitepaper, looking cheap and fraudulent helped stop a premature vehement utterance or exclamation amongst the crypto populace of a trillion dollar logo and solid open source technology before its time.

From day #2 forward to this day, the price of iEthereum has been heavily manipulated. This is hard to prove in writing but perhaps I can in a video in the future. Now looking at the 3 year, 5 year and max charts of iEthereum; I can not complain. I actually see that it is being manipulated to look really good on paper. And this benefits you and me as we can still pick up very cheap iEthereum. It is a very healthy looking chart over the long run. Traders may seem to have their own opinions. Traders like to look for just the upside on whatever time frame they like to trade. I like to look at the health of the overall lifespan. As an investor, I like to look at the chart as if I am a doctor, which I am not, and see that there is a good pulse and that we are not flatlining.

Around 2020, the mystery continued and confusion ensued. New iEthereum tokens emerged with a new team that was still operating in the shadows. A new iEthereum with a red logo and differentiating contract was created. Additionally, an iEthereum Finance token with the same logo yet Green was created. These tokens were announced via public channels; ie telegram, websites and even via certain exchanges. We have been touching on this topic lightly as it part of the iEthereum mystery and history. We see certain positive and negative perspectives pertaining to these additional coins. However, this adds confusion and instills a lack of faith into the project; thus creates major interference of adoption of the project.

At this point in time, we see the original iEthereum token as being a superior product. We do not publicly support the new “red” iEthereum, although we feel obliged to cover the mystery of the new tokens. It is a balancing act. I would prefer to not mention it, but then I wouldn’t be accurately recording the iEthereum history. If I do write about it; then I am bringing more attention to it. The truth of the situation is it could be a highly valued ecosystem development or it could be a fraudulent injection. The point is, we do not know. Expect many articles to lightly cover when necessary and one article in the future to explicitly cover the Blue, Red, and Green tokens in depth until we learn more. Until then we are confident to state the facts that interference and constraining of the iEthereum adoption is taking place.

Furthermore, the crypto indexing sites such as CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko are playing their own roles in the interference play.

CoinGecko more so than CoinMarketCap. Well this is a matter of opinion while we are still in the dark involving the iEthereum project. If the new token is a fraud, CoinGecko is complicit, in my opinion. We have written an open public letter of record to address. They have acknowledged and redressed the first letter of acknowledgement while ignoring the total fix. CoinGecko actually lists the new iEthereum token contract for users of the site/ investors that are clicking through for research while publishing the prices of the original iEthereum. Why run this confusion? Prior to receiving communication, one could presume the errors are human mistake. Now its undeniable it is intentional. If the new iEthereum is not fraudulent; they have done the community favor. And I will give them credit where credit is deserved when the time comes.

The CoinMarketCap interference is not so egregious. But it does highlight the power structures constrainment of iEthereum from premature adoption. People use CoinMarketCap and other index sites as a form of crypto research. The tokens are listed in a simple list that the user is able to click through various forms of due diligence. This includes the token projects website, the block explorer ledger, social media sites, price charts and the markets to name a few. Under the iEthereum markets tab; CMC lists only Yobit and Mercatox as the place to buy or sell iEthereum. The Mercatox market for iEthereum is closed and has been for awhile. This is a different story that I have written a complete separate article and can be read here. iEthereum is also available on Uniswap which does as much daily volume trading across three pairs. Uniswap is a listed exchange for most other tokens that have trading pairs on Uniswap. But not for iEthereum.

This is a summary of the shenanigans that are taking place involving iEthereum. We can only speculate that these constraining measures are taking place with resources being spent to obstruct adoption from taking place faster than market is ready. We talk at greater lengths for each of these obstacles in separate more detailed articles. Please feel free to scroll through our publishing archive.

I would also like to make note that we do not have a problem with a solid product launch strategy taking place. We would prefer to see a strong use case as a foundation prior to any speculation or massive price rise. Perhaps this is what we are witnessing.

iEther way, We see value!